Re: Partition table in 9.0.x?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partition table in 9.0.x? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10931.1357667500@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Partition table in 9.0.x? (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 8:45 AM, AJ Weber <aweber@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> \d+ doesn't appear to display any size information. > It does if you use it without an argument, to display all the tables > in the search path: > jjanes=# \d+ > List of relations > Schema | Name | Type | Owner | Size | Description > --------+------------------+-------+--------+---------+------------- > public | pgbench_accounts | table | jjanes | 128 MB | > public | pgbench_branches | table | jjanes | 40 kB | > public | pgbench_history | table | jjanes | 0 bytes | > public | pgbench_tellers | table | jjanes | 40 kB | > (4 rows) > It rather annoys me that you actually get less information (no size, > no owner) when you use \d+ on a named table. I don't know if there is > a reason for that feature, or if it was just an oversight. This is actually an abbreviation for \dtisv+, which is a completely different command from "\d table". You can use something like "\dt+ table-pattern" to get a display of the above form for a subset of tables. I agree it ain't too consistent. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: