Re: the behaviour of timestamp on postgres.
От | Csaba Nagy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: the behaviour of timestamp on postgres. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1092239632.28827.4.camel@coppola.ecircle.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: the behaviour of timestamp on postgres. (Prabu Subroto <prabu_subroto@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Prabu, Be aware that this will only work for inserts, and updating the row will not automatically update the timestamp column. You will have to do it yourself if you need that, either by using the right query (which is actually a preferred solution). Automatically you could do it through a rule - but I have never used the Postgres rule system, so I don't know how to do that. The update trigger posted in another reply will also work. HTH, Csaba. On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 16:47, Prabu Subroto wrote: > It's solved. > > Thank you very much, Doug. > > Thanks. > --- Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org> wrote: > > > Prabu Subroto <prabu_subroto@yahoo.com> writes: > > > > > How can I make the postgres complete the value of > > the > > > timestamp field automatically? > > > > Add a DEFAULT NOW() clause to the column definition. > > > > > > -Doug > > -- > > Let us cross over the river, and rest under the > > shade of the trees. > > --T. J. Jackson, 1863 > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: