Re: Postgresql + containerization possible use case
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql + containerization possible use case |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 108daeb6-f0c5-a4cc-15e4-515e17758b8c@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Postgresql + containerization possible use case (Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgresql + containerization possible use case
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 12/10/21 01:24, Achilleas Mantzios wrote: > Hi > > The idea for future upgrades is to containerize certain aspects of the > software. The questions are (I am not skilled in docker, only minimal > contact with lxd) : > - is this a valid use case for containerization? > - are there any gotchas around postgersql, the reliability of the system ? > - since we are talking about 4+ basic services (pgsqk, jboss, uucp, > samba), is docker a good fit or should we be looking into lxd as well? > - are there any success stories of other after following a similar path? My question is what is it going to change? The software in the containers still need to be maintained/upgraded and now you have added maintenance and management of the container software and communication between containers. > > Thank you! > > PS > > For those who wonder about UUCP, UUCP was our comms solution prior we > installed TCP/IP on the vessels. However, to this day, it provides a > nice management layer, a sort of protection before data leave the vessel > or reach the vessel, in a user controlled manner. So uucp stayed as it > matched exactly the business as far data transfers and emails are > concerned. It would be hard to uniformly manage data transfers and > emails in/out in a plain TCP/IP setup (rsync, ftp, etc, > sendmail/exim4/postfix or other MTA). > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: