Re: Custom type with width specifier
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Custom type with width specifier |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1088504376.2680.4.camel@fuji.krosing.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Custom type with width specifier (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On P, 2004-06-27 at 17:53, Tom Lane wrote: > Shachar Shemesh <psql@shemesh.biz> writes: > > What do I need to do in order to get the width specifier into my type? > > Rewrite the grammar. Width modifiers are only supported on types that > are hard-wired into the grammar, mainly because they look way too much > like function calls to be distinguished without special hacking. > > Consider for example the implications of the fact that this works: > > regression=# select numeric(17,10) '1.23'; > numeric > -------------- > 1.2300000000 > (1 row) > > bison has to decide *before scanning beyond the left parenthesis* > whether "numeric" is a function name or a type name. > > If you can think of a more general solution, I'm all ears, but it looks > like a hard problem that would require considerable rethinking of the > present grammar for these things. can't we make type(width) an actual function which returns another type ? this would make it even possible to add support for things like NUMBER(17,10) as an alias for NUMERIC(17,10) as an user-level addon. --------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: