Re: psql \watch versus \timing
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql \watch versus \timing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10853.1369002832@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | psql \watch versus \timing (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql \watch versus \timing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> writes: > I'd like to run same query repeatedly and see how long it takes each time. > I thought \watch would be excellent for this, but it turns out that using > \watch suppresses the output of \timing. > Is this intentional, or unavoidable? \watch uses PSQLexec not SendQuery; the latter implements \timing which I agree is arguably useful here, but also autocommit/auto-savepoint behavior which probably isn't a good idea. It might be a good idea to refactor those two routines into one routine with some sort of bitmap flags argument to control the various add-on behaviors, but that seems like not 9.3 material anymore. > Also, is it just or does the inability to watch more frequently than once a > second make it a lot less useful than it could be? It did not seem that exciting to me. In particular, we've already found out that \watch with zero delay is a pretty bad idea, so you'd have to make a case for what smaller minimum to use if it's not to be 1 second. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: