Re: data=writeback
От | Chris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: data=writeback |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1081414889.5037.29.camel@dell обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | data=writeback ("Priem, Alexander" <ap@cict.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
> LABEL=/usr/local/pgsql /usr/local/pgsql ext3 > noatime,data=writeback 1 2 > LABEL=/usr/local/pgsql /usr/local/pgsql/wal ext3 > noatime,data=ordered 1 2 The same label mounted on two different mount points is probably I typo? I'm not sure if data=writeback is ok. I was wondering about the same thing after reading the "good pc but bad performance,why?" thread. This is from man mount: writeback Data ordering is not preserved - data may be written into the main file system after its metadata has been commit- ted to the journal. This is rumoured to be the highest- throughput option. It guarantees internal file system integrity, however it can allow old data to appear in files after a crash and journal recovery. How does this relate to fflush()? Does fflush still garantee all data has ben written? Bye, Chris.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: