Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1080.1154435666@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin) (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)
Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Maybe we need to abandon trying to map float8 results exactly in the > resultmap file, and just let pg_regress pick the best fit as we do with > some other tests. I thought about that too but it seems a very bad idea. small-is-zero is distinctly "less correct" than the regular output, and I don't think we want pg_regress to be blindly accepting it as OK on any platform. Perhaps we could stick a version check into the resultmap lookup? It'd likely have been painful on the shell script implementation but now that the code is in C I think we have lots of flexibility. There's no need to feel bound by the historical resultmap format. However this is all premature unless we can verify that "cgywin's strtod() complains about float underflow after version so-and-so". Do they publish a detailed change log? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: