Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed with error - ERROR: column "a" inchild table must be marked NOT NULL
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed with error - ERROR: column "a" inchild table must be marked NOT NULL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 107ccc78-1a10-ff59-e837-e5c99dc8c152@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed with error - ERROR: column "a" inchild table must be marked NOT NULL (Ali Akbar <the.apaan@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed with error - ERROR: column "a" inchild table must be marked NOT NULL
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/12/13 15:59, Ali Akbar wrote: > 2017-12-13 9:10 GMT+07:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>: > >> >> It is not the first time that this topic shows up. See for example >> this thread from myself's version of last year: >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTPXgX9HiyhhtAgpW7jbA1is >> kMCSoqXPEEB_KYXYy1E1Q@mail.gmail.com >> Or this one: >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/21633.1448383428@sss.pgh.pa.us >> >> And the conclusion is that we don't want to do what you are doing >> here, and that it would be better to store NOT NULL constraints in a >> way similar to CHECK constraints. >> > > Thanks for the link to those thread. > > Judging from the discussion there, it will be a long way to prevent DROP > NOT NULL. Yeah, I remembered that discussion when writing my email, but was for some reason convinced that everything's fine even without the elaborate book-keeping of inheritance information for NOT NULL constraints. Thanks Michael for reminding. Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: