Re: [pgsql-www] buildfarm git references pointing at github?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] buildfarm git references pointing at github? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 107c2056-81e3-1909-1d63-49220c527546@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-www] buildfarm git references pointing at github? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-www] buildfarm git references pointing at github?
Re: [pgsql-www] buildfarm git references pointing at github? |
Список | pgsql-www |
On 03/14/2017 10:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> As for use of github, its use is hardcoded in the case of multi-commit >> changesets because I don't know a way to make the standard gitweb >> display those, although it might exist. And TBH github's display of >> indiviual commits is lots nicer, too. Compare >> <https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/a82178020de2c4b3576d0a079e11a431e382e4de> >> with >> <https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=a82178020de2c4b3576d0a079e11a431e382e4de> > Beauty is in the eye of the beholder I guess, but to me the first one > is a prime example of crappy webdesign --- too busy, too convinced that > randomly colored backgrounds and legibility-killing font coloring choices > are great ideas. So I guess you're also not keen on gitweb's commitdiff display suggested nearby by Justin Clift? Is there anyone else who wants to stick with the commit display instead of switching to commitdiff? > I really would rather not be directed to github when > checking on our commits. I have already changed that except for the case where gitweb provides no equivalent functionality (the "Change set" links). cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: