Re: Pl/Java - next step?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Cramer
Тема Re: Pl/Java - next step?
Дата
Msg-id 1077473268.1642.252.camel@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Pl/Java - next step?  ("Thomas Hallgren" <thhal@mailblocks.com>)
Ответы Re: Pl/Java - next step?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Not to minimize your work, as I think it is great, but this particular
use-case I consider to be overkill for pl/java. It is probably easier to
use pl/pgsql if all you want to do is calculations.

We had suggested an online chat to discuss this, when would you be
available for that? What timezone are you in. Laszlo is in hungary, and
I am in canada, so we are likely spread allover the the map .

Dave


On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 12:28, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> > 1) Using JNI, you probably still want to communicate with another
> > running java process.
> 
> B.T.W. I don't really agree on "probably". There are numerous cases when you
> will be happy just communicating with the database, communicate with another
> remote resource (message queue typically), or not communicate at all
> (calculations, etc.).
> 
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren
> 
> 
-- 
Dave Cramer
519 939 0336
ICQ # 14675561



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Thomas Hallgren"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pl/Java - next step?
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pl/perl thoughts