Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1077.24.211.165.134.1165083833.squirrel@www.dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue
Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 11:05 -0600, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> > >> > O.k., doesn't this seem like killing a squirrel with a 50mm tank gun? >> > The fact that this was suggested as anything but a last resort isn't >> to >> > inspiring. >> > >> >> Before you start ringing alarm bells, you need to instrument the actual >> performance effect. > > Alarm bells? I saw a potential issue, I brought it to the community. > That is all. You said: "Essentially, this makes win32 impossible in a 24x7 environment (jokes aside about Win32 in general) because we *have* to defrag on Windows and Windows won't defrag open files (thus anything PostgreSQL is using)." What I am asking for is evidence to back up that assertion. At the moment it is, as Tom likes to say, "a fact not in evidence". (I should have thought a single file DB would be MORE liable to fragmentation, BTW). cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: