Re: RC1 blocker issues
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RC1 blocker issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1077.24.211.165.134.1164406027.squirrel@www.dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RC1 blocker issues (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: >> * possible rearrangement of pg_stat column order: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00643.php >> Should we do this, and if so should we force initdb (via a catversion >> change)? I'm currently leaning to the thought that if we change it >> we should force initdb, else we'll risk having a noticeable user-visible >> difference between different "8.2" installations. > > Actually, on looking closer, we *must* force initdb because this changes > the expected output for the rules regression test. > > So, yea or nay? I'm working up the patch right now, but will hold off > applying until I hear some comments. > Fixing it later would be nastier, or impossible. I think we should fix it now. We don't have an absolute promise not to require an initdb during beta, do we? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: