Re: Postgress and MYSQL
От | Matt Davies |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgress and MYSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1074113916.4005ad7c3fd8d@www.mattdavies.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgress and MYSQL (Martin Marques <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgress and MYSQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Quoting Martin Marques <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>: > Oh, please! I have never seen such a better community then this one (well, > some > exceptions come to mind right now, but it's still within the best). > > I have personally found GREAT replys from the developers (Tom Lane comes to > mind, saving me lots of time in some ocations), and users of this list. > > Don't missunderstand me. Everyone (including me) some times makes responces > in a > bit of a hard manner, but I think you have to see the whole picture, and not > a > par of snapshots. > > P.D.: BTW, RTFM is very good. You can learn alot from them. ;-) This thread is getting long and out in never-never land. I have RTFM. In fact, many times. As a matter of practice I subscribe long before I post. I RTFM, I google, attempted to search the docs and lists, ... My comments come from my experiences and others. Yes, Tom Lane has wonderful advice and help. I do not mean to call the PG baby ugly (as I fear some people have taken it), I only mean to point out some areas (as others have in this thread) that could be improved upon that would greatly enhance PG. Imagine this: more users, more installations, more (selective) development fingers. Not all users are rocket scientists, but the video game rule applies to many: if I can't get it going in X (user preference) minutes then it isn't worth the trouble. Should PG be limited to only those who are hard core DB users? If so, I don't think PG will take off as fast. OK, I am done.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: