Re: Query preparation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query preparation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10718.1239808274@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Query preparation (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Query preparation
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com> writes: > Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> Does anyone see a problem with caching the result set descriptor >> (RowDescription)? AFAICS it should never change after a statement is >> prepared. If not, I'll polish up and submit the patch. > If you tie it to the existing named statement mechanisms I think that > works. We invalidate the named statement anyway if the parameter types > change, and you want to invalidate any cached row description at the > same time. Schema changes could bite you, but I think they bite named > statements in other ways anyway. (Not sure how far the server-side > efforts to do plan invalidation progressed) It should be safe. The server is set up to throw an error if you try to re-use a prepared statement whose output tuple descriptor would have changed due to schema changes. So there's a backstop if the driver's invalidation logic misses anything. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: