Re: Very strange postgresql behaviour
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Very strange postgresql behaviour |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10668.1170084953@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Very strange postgresql behaviour (Arnau <arnaulist@andromeiberica.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Very strange postgresql behaviour
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Arnau <arnaulist@andromeiberica.com> writes: > I have postgresql 7.4.2 running on debian and I have the oddest > postgresql behaviour I've ever seen. Is this specific to these two rows? If so it might be a case of this bug, which was repaired in 7.4.13: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-05/msg00756.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-05/msg00174.php 2006-05-19 12:31 tgl * src/backend/executor/nodeIndexscan.c (REL7_4_STABLE): Fix nasty bug in nodeIndexscan.c's detection of duplicate tuples during a multiple (OR'ed) indexscan. It was checking for duplicate tuple->t_data->t_ctid, when what it should be checking is tuple->t_self. The trouble situation occurs when a live tuple has t_ctid not pointing to itself, which can happen if an attempted UPDATE was rolled back. After a VACUUM, an unrelated tuple could be installed where the failed update tuple was, leading to one live tuple's t_ctid pointing to an unrelated tuple. If one of these tuples is fetched by an earlier OR'ed indexscan and the other by a later indexscan, nodeIndexscan.c would incorrectly ignore the second tuple. The bug exists in all 7.4.* and 8.0.* versions, but not in earlier or later branches because this code was only used in those releases. Per trouble report from Rafael Martinez Guerrero. REINDEX wouldn't fix this, although a table dump and reload would. regards, tom lane PS: please don't spam multiple lists with the same question.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: