Re: massive quotes?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: massive quotes? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10663.1063375820@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: massive quotes? (Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: massive quotes?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org> writes: > ... then @autoconf me harder@ could be used as the start and ending > token, Hm, I should have read your message more carefully --- I missed the bit at the middle where you propose nearly the same idea I had ;-). But the flex patterns you wrote don't actually support this do they? > @(@[^\n]+\n|[^@]*@) > %(%[^\n]+\n|[^%]*%) > $($[^\n]+\n|[^$]*$) Doesn't quite seem to do what we're talking about here. I don't see a need for three of these; that just eats up lexical token space. Is there a reason for the $ variant not to be enough? In any case, @ and % are valid (and popular) operator names in Postgres, so we could not use them for this purpose without removing that meaning, which would be painful. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: