Re: sun solaris & postgres
От | Cindy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: sun solaris & postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10648.1021928974@stephanus.tlg.uci.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: sun solaris & postgres (Darren Ferguson <darren@crystalballinc.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
No, if you read more carefully, att is the one that is performing its operations an order of magnitude faster than steph, which is why we're so stumped. But I think I located the problem (see other email). Darren Ferguson writes: >That could be why 7.1.3 is out performing it has 8 times more memory than >the 7.2.1 machine > >What about CPU's, controllers and are both config files the same for steph >and att? > >Darren Ferguson > >On Mon, 20 May 2002, Cindy wrote: > >> >> mpls@ipv6.dns2go.com writes: >> > >> >Difference specification ?? >> >How many memory in att and steph? >> >> steph has >> Memory size: 4096 Megabytes >> att has >> Memory size: 512 Megabytes >> >> --Cindy >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html >> > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > >http://archives.postgresql.org > -- Cindy ctmoore@uci.edu
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: