Re: career in SQL/Database administration

On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 11:27, Dan Anderson wrote:
> > We dont' do hourly rates.  We do it by the job.  Therefore, the consumer
> > doesn't have to think about how much they're paying us per hour.  The just
> > have to think about the benefits in relation to the cost.  It also allows
> > us to get better profit margins, because we can automate in innovative
> > ways, and it doesn't cost us revenue.
>
> <rant>
>     Hehehe but this can pose problems.  Lets say you've got a contract to
> do foo by a week from today.  You deliver on foo and do an amazing job
> and get it to the customer two days early.  The client should be ready
> to bow down before you as lord -- this is how good the job is.  So he
> does it, right?
>
>     Well, in my experience it depends on the customer.  If you get a
> customer who knows IT, then yes, they bow down before you and hire you
> again.  But more often you get a customer who doesn't know IT, and
> didn't realize exactly what he or she was ordering.  So you've got a
> client looking for revisions.  But revisions mean substantially altering
> the code base and losing lots of time (and $$$).
>
>     So what do you do?  Sue them?  Costs more then the client's contract is
> worth.  Tell the customer to pay more?  They may walk away and the
> deposit won't cover all costs.  And if they say the contract wasn't
> consummated (it wasn't what they wanted) see the section on lawsuits.
> So now what, send them to collections?  Maybe -- if you're big enough to
> get a contract with a national collections agency.  If not you're
> basically consigned to bend over, and smile nicely as you get screwed
> over with revisions.
>
> </rant>
>
> (Anybody with suggestions on what to do with people like this please
> feel free to chime in.  :-D)

What you needs is a better lawyer, to write tighter contracts.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net
Jefferson, LA USA

Spit in one hand, and wish for peace in the other.
Guess which is more effective...