Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10635.1467410468@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2016-06-30 10:14:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes: >>> As far as I read the code of the function, those arguments don't seem to >>> be necessary. So I'm afraid that the pg_proc entry for the function might >>> be incorrect and those two arguments should be removed from the definition. >> Sure looks that way from here. Copy-and-paste from the previous >> line in pg_proc.h, perhaps? > Yes, that's clearly wrong. Damn. Can't fix that for 9.5 anymore. The > function isn't all that important (especially not from SQL), but still, > that's annoying. I'm inclined to just remove the args in 9.6. We could > also add a note to the 9.5 docs, adding that the arguments are there by > error? Yeah, seems like the best thing to do. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: