Re: About GPL and proprietary software
От | Ron Johnson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: About GPL and proprietary software |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1063057215.17057.442.camel@haggis обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: About GPL and proprietary software (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: About GPL and proprietary software
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 15:25, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Richard Huxton wrote: > > What happens with an application built on top of MySQL+PHP I couldn't say. I'm > > guessing your PHP scripts can be distributed under any licence you like, but > > you couldn't distribute MySQL+PHP with them. > > > > Anyway, their intention is that you *can't* distribute your application > > without either GPL-ing it or buying a licence. One of the reasons why a BSD > > licence is more friendly from a business point of view, although it does mean > > companies can release proprietry extensions that they keep private. > > And contribute them to the community after 1-2 years, which has happened > often. But they don't have to. The Unix Wars were caused by large companies that took BSD and made proprietary extensions. Thus, there are pit- falls to both GPL & BSD (not to mention straight-up proprietary licenses). -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net Jefferson, LA USA An ad run by the NEA (the US's biggest public school TEACHERS UNION) in the Spring and Summer of 2003 asks a teenager if he can find sodium and *chloride* in the periodic table of the elements. And they wonder why people think public schools suck...
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: