Re: Insert performance
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Insert performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1061221963.2620.4.camel@fuji.krosing.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Insert performance ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Shridhar Daithankar kirjutas E, 18.08.2003 kell 09:21: > On 16 Aug 2003 at 11:40, Josh Berkus wrote: > > > Shridhar, > > > > > Unfortunately he can not use copy due to some constraints. > > > > Why not use COPY to load the table, and then apply the constraints by query > > afterwords? It might not be faster, but then again it might. > > Lol.. The constraints I mentioned weren't database constraints.. Can't you still apply them later ;) My own experimentation also got numbers in 9k/sec range (on a quad 1.3GHz Xeons, 2GM mem, 50MB/sec raid) when doing 10-20 parallel runs of ~1000 inserts/transaction. Performance dropped to ~300/sec (at about 60M rows) when I added an index (primary key) - as I did random inserts, the hit rates for index pages were probably low. -------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: