Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10591.1123545884@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method
Re: Simplifying wal_sync_method |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Marko Kreen wrote: >> On same topic: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-07/msg00811.php >> Why does win32 PostgreSQL allow data corruption by default? > It behaves the same on Unix as Win32, and if you have battery-backed > cache, you don't need writethrough, so we don't have it as default. I > am going to write a section in the manual for 8.1 about these > reliability issues. I thought we had changed the default for Windows to be fsync_writethrough in 8.1? We didn't have that code in 8.0, but now that we do, it surely seems like the sanest default. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: