Re: tsearch V2 (Was: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze)
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tsearch V2 (Was: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1056092652.1759.11.camel@fuji.krosing.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tsearch V2 (Was: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze) (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker kirjutas R, 20.06.2003 kell 08:28: > On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > Is there a strong reason why tsearch isn't in gborg? > > > > I think text search is a pretty important facility that should > > eventually be part of the core distribution. It's more likely to get > > there from contrib than from gborg ... > > Why part of the core distribution, and not just left as a loadable module, > like it is now? I remember Tom saying that builtin functions calls are a lot faster than loadable C functions. If that can be fixed, then it *could* stay loadable. Also, having built-in full text indexing is very desirable. And I don't see any even nearly as good competing fulltext indexing modules anywhere. If we had to move something *out* of core in order to get tsearch in, then I personally would not mind if all geometry types go to gborg, but I'm sure there are some users who would mind ;) --------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: