Re: PostgreSQL calibration
| От | matt |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL calibration |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1055957804.3900.52.camel@gibraltar.mattclark.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL calibration (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL calibration
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
Are there really any performance settings of much interest beyond the shared and non-shared memory settings? Beyond those the interactions get so complex that automation is probably impossible anyway, and certain options like fsync = false should never be 'recommended'. On the other hand, a way of empirically deriving some 'correct' optimizer parameters for a given machine would be very nice :-) Matt On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 18:07, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Sure, it would be great if we could do it. > > If the program actually derives reliable numbers, it would be great. > It could easily do more harm than good if it gives bogus results. > I think it will be very hard to get reliable rather than bogus results > :-( ... but feel free to try. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: