Re: [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10549.1243949503@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections (Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections
Re: [RFC,PATCH] SIGPIPE masking in local socket connections |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> writes: > The following patch changes psecure_write to be more like psecure_read - > it only alters the signal mask if the connection is over SSL. It's only > an RFC, as I'm not entirely sure about the reasoning behind blocking > SIGPIPE for the non-SSL case - there may be other considerations here. The consideration is that the application fails completely on server disconnect (because it gets SIGPIPE'd). This was long ago deemed unacceptable, and we aren't likely to change our opinion on that. What disturbs me about your report is the suggestion that there are paths through that code that fail to protect against SIGPIPE. If so, we need to fix that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: