Re: Performance on temp table inserts
От | Jeff Boes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance on temp table inserts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1053434229.4973.1.camel@takin.private.nexcerpt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance on temp table inserts (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance on temp table inserts
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Tue, 2003-05-20 at 00:51, Tom Lane wrote: > Jeff Boes <jboes@nexcerpt.com> writes: > > What factors affect the performance of a temp table insert? > > PG version would have a lot to do with that, considering how we've > whacked around the temp-table implementation in the last few releases. > > > Hardware, O/S and PostgreSQL versions are all identical. > > And they are? Red Hat Linux release 7.1 (Seawolf) Kernel 2.4.18-17.7.xbigmem on a 2-processor i686 We have 4 GB of memory and a 53GB partition on a RAID device for the PG data. PG version is 7.2.4. -- Jeff Boes vox 269.226.9550 ext 24 Database Engineer fax 269.349.9076 Nexcerpt, Inc. http://www.nexcerpt.com ...Nexcerpt... Extend your Expertise
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: