Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron?
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1053419374.1435.4.camel@fuji.krosing.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | postgres on a beowulf? (AMD)opteron? (george young <gry@ll.mit.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
george young kirjutas E, 19.05.2003 kell 20:28: > Has anyone run postgres on a beowulf system? I don't think that postgresql will easyly port to beowulf clusters. > I'm shopping for a new server. One candidate would be a > quad opteron (64-bit AMD "hammer") machine. Another approach might > be a beowulf of single or dual opterons. I imagine the beowulf > would be a bit cheaper, and much more expandable, but what about > the shared memory used by the postgres backends? I gather that > postgres uses shared memory to coordinate (locks?) between backends? > > I have a smallish DB (pgdump|bzip2 -> 10MB), with ~45 users logged in > using local X(python/gtk) postgres client apps. Why do you want such a monster machine for this smallish DB ? Are there any special performance requirements you are not telling us about ? > Will the much slower shared memory access between beowulf nodes be > a performance bottleneck? I guess that it will not run at all ;( -------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: