Re: [PATCH] psql visibility clarification patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] psql visibility clarification patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10531.1043386380@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [PATCH] psql visibility clarification patch ("D. Hageman" <dhageman@dracken.com>) |
Ответы |
poor performance of subquery in psql
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"D. Hageman" <dhageman@dracken.com> writes: > The goal of this patch is a solution to the issue that I found concerning > table visibility. The problem with the way psql currently lists tables in > a database is that it limits it to only the tables currently in the search > path. That's the intended behavior. I don't think that "\dt foo" should show any tables other than the same "foo" you'd get from an unqualified reference to "foo". If you want to know about foos that are not in your search path, you can do "\dt *.foo". Your proposed patch essentially eliminates the distinction between \dt foo and \dt *.foo. This doesn't seem like a step forward to me. Perhaps what's really needed is a documentation patch explaining when to use each? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: