Re: why generated columsn cannot be used in COPY TO?
От | Ron |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why generated columsn cannot be used in COPY TO? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10519e75-1903-ebd2-2625-4f5b655a02bb@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why generated columsn cannot be used in COPY TO? ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/6/23 11:08, David G. Johnston wrote:
At least it's explicitly mentioned in the docs that generated columns are excluded.
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 8:54 AM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:On 10/6/23 08:45, Ron wrote:
> On 10/6/23 09:04, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure how convincing that reasoning is, but it was at least
>>> thought about. I do agree with it as far as the default column
>>> list goes, but maybe we could allow explicit selection of these
>>> columns in COPY TO.
>>
>> sounds okay
>
> Nah. "The programmer -- and DBA -- on the Clapham omnibus" quite
> reasonably expects that COPY table_name TO (output)" copies all the
> columns listed in "\d table_name".
>
Yeah, I would agree.Sure, but it doesn't. Mainly since copy's original design was intended to solve the dump/restore problem and it doesn't make sense to specify data for inbound generated data. So while we do have a POLA violation here the desirability to now fix it years later is basically zero. And the current behavior is at least defensible and consistent. And there is a very easy way to get the desired output making any change that much harder a sell.
At least it's explicitly mentioned in the docs that generated columns are excluded.
The error message maybe could use some help though, and if there isn't a hint maybe add one.David J.
--
Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.
Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: