Re: There are advantages to having an odd name
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: There are advantages to having an odd name |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1051040063.1958.14.camel@fuji.krosing.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | There are advantages to having an odd name (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: There are advantages to having an odd name
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane kirjutas L, 19.04.2003 kell 05:53: > From time to time someone tells us that we'd be lots more successful > if only we had a more user-friendly project name than "PostgreSQL". > Right at the moment, I'm quite happy to be using a name that no one > else would want ... > > http://slashdot.org/articles/03/04/18/0344251.shtml?tid=154 It's good to be reminded (in the light of the 'losing momentum' discussion focusing mainly on MySQL) that there are also 'real' databases (Interbase/firebird and SAP DB) that have possibility to catch up with us. One of the posts claimed Firebird (SQL) to be so good that if they could get 1/10th of the resources that postgresSQL has then postgreSQL wil be obliviated in 2 years ;-p > (I feel bad for the Firebird-the-database folks, btw --- sheesh, > the slashdot discussion can't even get straight that they are > Firebird not FirebirdSQL.) I was also quite upset by it. I quite liked the proposal in another post proposing to name browsers like unix commands so Phoenix/Firebird could be just 'br' ;) ----------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: