Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: array support patch phase 1 patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1049831223.1874.8.camel@fuji.krosing.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: array support patch phase 1 patch (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway kirjutas T, 08.04.2003 kell 19:55: > Hannu Krosing wrote: > > SELECT ARRAY[1,2] < ARRAY[1,2,3]; # --> FALSE > > > > Support for sorting and b-tree indexing could be nice too. > > I thought briefly about this, but it wasn't immediately clear what the > semantics ought to be in all cases. I've also spent literally all my > available "hacking" time for the last several weeks just to get to the > patch submitted. I'd like to see at least some of it committed before I > take on anything new ;-) > > If you want to propose in detail how these would behave - including: I like the "compare like strings" approach > - different length arrays shorter is smaller if all elements are same > - different dimension arrays not comparable, just as array elemant is not comparable with array > - is comparison by ordinal position, or is each element compared to > all elements of the other side, neither, pairs of elements at same positions are compared until first != or one array ends, then the shorter array the array with smaller element value is considered smaller. > e.g. is > (ARRAY[1,2,3] < ARRAY[2,3,4]) TRUE or FALSE? > If you compare by ordinal position TRUE, but in the latter case > FALSE all the following should also be TRUE (ARRAY[1,2,3] < ARRAY[2,1,1]) (ARRAY[1,2,3] < ARRAY[1,2,3,4]) (ARRAY[] < ARRAY[1,2,3,4]) (ARRAY[1,2,3,4] < ARRAY[1,2,4,3]) > > Where should one start to add PL/Python support for polymorphic types ? > > Not entirely sure. In plperl, pltcl, and plr there is a section of code > in the compile function that looks something like: > > .... Thanks, I'll take a look. > > What about moving contrib/intagg into backend ? > > (And converting it into ANYagg on the way ;) > > > > As I said earlier, all in good time ;-) One question about that though > -- how is intagg different from array_accum? (which is already > polymorphic and in the submitted patch) Sorry, didn't notice array_accum. intagg has functions for doing it both ways (array->table and table -> array). ----------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: