Re: location of the configuration files
| От | Martin Coxall |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: location of the configuration files |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1045135246.915.28.camel@gypsumfantastic.positive-internet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: location of the configuration files ("J. M. Brenner" <doom@kzsu.stanford.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: location of the configuration files
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Well, to the extent that you're serious, you understand that > a lot of people feel that /usr/local should be reserved for > stuff that's installed by the local sysadmin, and your > vendor/distro isn't supposed to be messing with it. > > Which means if the the vendor installed Postgresql (say, the > Red Hat Database) you'd expect config files to be in /etc. > If the postgresql is compiled from source by local admin, > you might look somewhere in /usr/local. Indeed. For better or worse, there is a Filesystem Hierarcy Standard, and most of the important Linux distros, BSDs and some legacy Unixen stick to it, so so should we. Configuration files should be in /etc/postgresql/, or at the very least symlinked from there. Martin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: