Re: PostgreSQL Benchmarks
От | Greg Copeland |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Benchmarks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1044974821.2501.135.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Benchmarks ("Mario Weilguni" <mario.weilguni@icomedias.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 08:31, Mario Weilguni wrote: > >Hrm. I just saw that the PHP ADODB guy just published a bunch of database > >benchmarks. It's fairly evident to me that benchmarking PostgreSQL on > >Win32 isn't really fair: > > >http://php.weblogs.com/oracle_mysql_performance > > And why is the highly advocated transaction capable MySQL 4 not tested? > That's the problem, for every performance test they choose ISAM tables, and > when transactions are mentioned it's said "MySQL has transactions". But why > no benchmarks? > Insert Statement Not using bind variables (MySQL and Oracle): $DB->BeginTrans(); Using bind variables: $DB->BeginTrans(); PL/SQL Insert Benchmark Appears to not initiate a transaction. I'm assuming this is because it's implicitly within a transaction? Oddly enough, I am seeing explicit commits here. It appears that the benchmarks are attempting to use transactions, however, I have no idea if MySQL's HEAP supports them. For all I know, transactions are being silently ignored. Regards, -- Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net> Copeland Computer Consulting
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: