Re: ODBC changes
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ODBC changes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10421.988781431@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ODBC changes (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > I see my copy is 12,222 bytes on both linux and cygwin. > I also heard from Eiji Tokuya that he sometimes(not always) > saw corrupted win32.mak. Unfortunately I don't understand > where the cause is. $ cd /home/postgres/pgsql/src/interfaces/odbc $ rm win32.mak $ cvs update cvs server: Updating . U win32.mak $ ls -l win32.mak -rw-r--r-- 1 postgres users 12222 May 2 01:23 win32.mak $ od -c win32.mak | head 0000000 \r \n # \r \n # F i l e : \t \t \t w 0000020 i n 3 2 . m a k \r \n # \r \n # D 0000040 e s c r i p t i o n : \t \t p s q 0000060 l o d b c M a k e f i l e f 0000100 o r W i n 3 2 . \r \n # \r \n # 0000120 C o n f i g u r a t i o n s : \t 0000140 D e b u g , R e l e a s e , 0000160 M u l t i b y t e D e b u g , 0000200 M u l t i b y t e R e l e a s e 0000220 \r \n # B u i l d T y p e s : I see nothing debatable here: what is on the CVS server is a file containing CR/LF newlines. If you have something else then it's been through a transfer process that altered the file. The question to be discussed is whether that's the way to distribute the file or not. We can certainly remove the CRs if not. BTW, by my count a Unix-newline version of this file would be 11736 bytes. A 12708-byte file would be broken in some strange new way (two LFs per newline, maybe?) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: