synchronized code
От | Felipe Schnack |
---|---|
Тема | synchronized code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1042051391.11833.108.camel@desenv1.ritterdosreis.br обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: synchronized code [Viruschecked]
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
I'm quite worried with the amount of synch'd code in our jdbc driver code, we all know this is a very costly operation in Java. As far as I could see from the sources, the sole objective of these calls are to avoid two processes accessing the same shared StringBuffer we use. The strangest thing, IMHO, is that every time we use this buffer, we are calling setLength(0) or, in plain english, resetting this buffer. Is just me the paranoid or this isn't helping performance at all? As I understand java, object creating is a very cheap operation these days (in the old days it was slow), but synch'ing is VERY costly... -- Felipe Schnack Analista de Sistemas felipes@ritterdosreis.br Cel.: (51)91287530 Linux Counter #281893 Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis http://www.ritterdosreis.br ritter@ritterdosreis.br Fone/Fax.: (51)32303341
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: