On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 13:36, Gerard Samuel wrote:
> Im not sure if this is the right list, but here goes.
> I have a dev box, that I allocated, 104M of space to share between,
> mysql & pgsql.
> In mysql, I have 376 tables across 11 databases which is taking up only
> 1.3M.
> In pgsql, I have 33 tables on 1 database, and that seems to be taking up
> 74M.
>
> Does postgresql require soooo much disk space to operate??
> Thanks for any insight you may provide.
Surely we'd need to know how many _rows_ there are in those tables? Also
how many indexes and index rows?
I believe that PostgreSQL does have greater overhead on disk than MySQL,
however. Just to have the database started will mean that you have a
number of write-ahead logs (typically 16MB each - on my laptop these
take up 114M) which are used internally by the database server for
transaction handling - MySQL doesn't need these, of course.
Cheers,
Andrew.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew @ Catalyst .Net.NZ Ltd, PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington
WEB: http://catalyst.net.nz/ PHYS: Level 2, 150-154 Willis St
DDI: +64(4)916-7201 MOB: +64(21)635-694 OFFICE: +64(4)499-2267
Survey for nothing with http://survey.net.nz/
---------------------------------------------------------------------