Re: Strange behaviour of JDBC driver for PostgreSQL
От | Thomas O'Dowd |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Strange behaviour of JDBC driver for PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1040256340.26880.483.camel@beast.uwillsee.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Strange behaviour of JDBC driver for PostgreSQL (Carlos Correia <carlos@m16e.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Strange behaviour of JDBC driver for PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Carlos, To satisfy everyones curiosity why don't you try sending us the output of the following command from your local machine... $ psql -h REMOTEHOSTNAME -U USERNAME -c 'SELECT version();' DBNAME This will access the remote database DBNAME in much the same way as the driver does. Tom. On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 02:55, Carlos Correia wrote: > Fernando, > > i am sure the db is version 7.2.2 > > Thanks anyway, > > Carlos > > Fernando Nasser wrote: > > > Carlos Correia wrote: > > > >> > >> Dave Cramer wrote: > >> > >>> Carlos, > >>> > >>> Is this a new message today, or one from yesterday? > >>> > >>> > >> Dave, > >> > >> It is the same messge, but as I think that everyone is > >> misunderstooding the problem, I'll try to resume it: > >> > >> 1. I don't know why the driver reports version 6.5.2, as I don't have > >> such a version. > > > > > > The JDBC driver receives the version from the database backend when > > connecting and that is what is printed by the > > getDatabaseProductVersion() function. There is no way it can generate > > a 6.x.x version number by itself. > > > > You _must_ be connecting to a 6.5.2 backend. > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) -- Thomas O'Dowd, CEO, Nooper.com - Mobile Services Inc., Tokyo, Japan i-mode & FOMA consulting, development, testing: http://nooper.co.jp/
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: