Re: Update on replication
От | Greg Copeland |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Update on replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1040178821.7608.21.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Update on replication (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>) |
Ответы |
Re: Update on replication
Re: Update on replication Re: Update on replication |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 20:07, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 07:43:05PM -0600, Greg Copeland wrote: > > On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 19:38, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > How come these solutions are such well kept secrets? I've heard of > > > neither in relation to past discussions about replication, or have I just > > > missed them? :( > > > > Good questions. I've heard of Usogres, more or less in passing, but > > heard it didn't work very well. > > I'm sure this is because there little or no documentation of the system > in english. I tried Usogres sometime ago, and felt really lost. I > managed to install it and maybe even got it to work, but the > documentation was so lacking that I didn't feel confident enough with > it. > > I think the same can be said of QueryMaster, plus it isn't mentioned > anywhere. How can I possibly search for documentation on a project if I > don't know it even exists? > > One would be tempted to say that GBorg is a good place to list > PostgreSQL related projects. Sadly, GBorg doesn't even have a > connection to the outside world. What value does it have if people > don't know it exists, or can't remember how to get to it? Let alone use > it to find a project... There are a couple of links to it from PostgreSQL's site, but you sorta have to look and hunt around. I've requested higher visibility but for whatever reason it seemed to be snubbed rather quickly. I do agree, GBorg needs MUCH higher visibility! -- Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net> Copeland Computer Consulting
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: