Re: Password security question
От | Greg Copeland |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Password security question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1040144418.16087.152.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Password security question (mlw <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 10:49, mlw wrote: > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > >Hi guys, > > > >Just a thought - do we explicitly wipe password strings from RAM after using > >them? > > > >I just read an article (by MS in fact) that illustrates a cute problem. > >Imagine you memset the password to zeros after using it. There is a good > >chance that the compiler will simply remove the memset from the object code > >as it will seem like it can be optimised away... > > > >Just wondering... > > > >Chris > > > > > Could you post that link? That seems wrong, an explicit memset certainly > changes the operation of the code, and thus should not be optimized away. > > > > > > I'd like to see the link too. I can imagine that it would be possible for it to optimize it away if there wasn't an additional read/write access which followed. In other words, why do what is more or less a no-op if it's never accessed again. -- Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net> Copeland Computer Consulting
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: