Re: Auto Vacuum Daemon (again...)

On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 13:09, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2002, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > Perhaps a more appropriate rule would be 1 AVD per tablespace?  Since
> > PostgreSQL only has a single tablespace at the moment....
> 
> But Postgresql can already place different databases on different data 
> stores.  I.e. initlocation and all.  If someone was using multiple SCSI 
> cards with multiple JBOD or RAID boxes hanging off of a box, they would 
> have the same thing, effectively, that you are talking about.
> 
> So, someone out there may well be able to use a multiple process AVD right 
> now.  Imagine m databases on n different drive sets for large production 
> databases.


That's right.  I always forget about that.  So, it seems, regardless of
the namespace effort, we shouldn't be limiting the number of concurrent
AVD's.


-- 
Greg Copeland <greg@copelandconsulting.net>
Copeland Computer Consulting