Re: Yet one more stupid question
От | Oliver Elphick |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Yet one more stupid question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1039034387.11430.923.camel@linda.lfix.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Yet one more stupid question (Dmitri Touretsky <dmitri@listsoft.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Yet one more stupid question
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 18:00, Dmitri Touretsky wrote: > One more question related to performance. I have a VERY BIG table > (abot 20 million records) which is accessed relatively seldom, like > once a day (basically, it's archived data which sometimes may be > needed). How this table affect performance of the database? Is it > worse to create another database for storing this data, and keep the > main DB small? It will make no difference to performance except when it is being used. -- Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C ======================================== "Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth. Therefore despise thou not the chastening of the Almighty." Job 5:17
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: