Re: [ADMIN] how to alter sequence.
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ADMIN] how to alter sequence. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1039017445.2281.22.camel@rh72.home.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] how to alter sequence. ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Shridhar Daithankar kirjutas K, 04.12.2002 kell 20:51: > On 4 Dec 2002 at 20:41, Hannu Krosing wrote: > > hannu=# update seq set max_value = 99; > > ERROR: You can't change sequence relation seq > > hannu=# update pg_class set relkind = 'r' where relname = 'seq'; > > UPDATE 1 > > hannu=# update seq set max_value = 99; > > UPDATE 1 > > hannu=# update pg_class set relkind = 'S' where relname = 'seq'; > > UPDATE 1 > > hannu=# select * from seq; > > sequence_name | last_value | increment_by | max_value | min_value | > > cache_value | log_cnt | is_cycled | is_called > > ---------------+------------+--------------+-----------+-----------+-------------+---------+-----------+----------- > > seq | 1 | 1 | 99 | 1 > > | 1 | 1 | f | f I just discovered that changing these numbers does not change how the sequence behaves ;( Even after restarting the backend! Sorry! > That makes me wonder. If sequense is treated like a single column single row > table and it's value is guarenteed to be increasing even in case of aborted > transaction, is it correct to say that postgresql already has nested > transactions, albeit dormant? No. Sequences live outside of transactions. I have no idea why there is also a ingle column single row table created. The output of \d command is also weird, for all sequences I get: hannu=# \d seq Sequence "public.seq" Column | Type ---------------+---------sequence_name | namelast_value | bigintincrement_by | bigintmax_value | bigintmin_value | bigintcache_value | bigintlog_cnt | bigintis_cycled | booleanis_called | boolean with only the Sequence name changing ... --------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: