Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10349.1050588886@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables (Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: GLOBAL vs LOCAL temp tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com> writes: > But as Tom pointed out, if you delete a bunch of data from a table > then insert a fresh set of data, but don't end up inserting much data > with roughly the same keys that were in the original batch of data, > you'll get a lot of empty areas in your index that are unused. VACUUM > marks them as being available for reuse, of course, but that doesn't > help you unless you insert data containing values that are appropriate > to the unused areas. No, you misunderstood. That is the problem in existing releases --- but in CVS tip, VACUUM can actually remove unused sections from the b-tree and make that space available for re-use in other key ranges. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: