Re: pg_stat_statements cluttered with "DEALLOCATE dbdpg_p*"
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stat_statements cluttered with "DEALLOCATE dbdpg_p*" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10346.1405878962@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stat_statements cluttered with "DEALLOCATE dbdpg_p*" (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_stat_statements cluttered with "DEALLOCATE
dbdpg_p*"
Re: pg_stat_statements cluttered with "DEALLOCATE dbdpg_p*" |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2014-07-20 17:01:50 +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote: >> If you do not like my normalization hack (I do not like it much either:-), I >> have suggested to add "&& !IsA(parsetree, DeallocateStmt)" to the condition >> above, which would ignore DEALLOCATE as PREPARE and EXECUTE are currently >> and rightfully ignored. > Well, EXECUTE isn't actually ignored, but tracked via the execution > time. But that doesn't diminish your point with PREPARE. If we do > something we should go for the && !IsA(parsetree, DeallocateStmt), not > the normalization. The latter is pretty darn bogus. Agreed. I think basically the reasoning here is "since we don't track PREPARE or EXECUTE, we shouldn't track DEALLOCATE either". However, this is certainly a behavioral change. Perhaps squeeze it into 9.4, but not the back braches? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: