Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
От | Greg Copeland |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1034343056.4863.53.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases (Anuradha Ratnaweera <anuradha@lklug.pdn.ac.lk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases
Re: Peer to peer replication of Postgresql databases |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I'd be curious to hear in a little more detail what constitutes "not good" for postgres on a mosix cluster. Greg On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 06:15, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 04:29:53PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > > > > Well, I don't think adding support for multiple slaves to usogres would be that > > problematic. Of course if you want to load balance your application queries, > > application has to be aware of that. I will not do sending requests to a mosix > > cluster anyway. > > Have already tested postgres on a mosix cluster, and as expected results > are not good. (although mosix does the correct thing in keeping all the > database backend processes on one node). > > Anuradha > > -- > > Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.18-xfs-1.1) > > Remember: Silly is a state of Mind, Stupid is a way of Life. > -- Dave Butler > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: