Re: Postgresql likes Tuesday...
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql likes Tuesday... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1033418798.2751.8.camel@rh72.home.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql likes Tuesday... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgresql likes Tuesday...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 03:31, Tom Lane wrote: > Offhand this seems kinda inconsistent to me --- I'd expect > > regression=# select extract(week from date '2002-09-30'); > date_part > ----------- > 40 > (1 row) > > to produce 39, not 40, on the grounds that the first day of Week 40 > is tomorrow not today. Alternatively, if today is the first day of > Week 40 (as EXTRACT(week) seems to think), then ISTM that the to_date > expression should produce today not tomorrow. > > I notice that 2001-12-31 is considered part of the first week of 2002, > which is also pretty surprising: There are at least 3 different ways to start week numbering: 1. from first week with any days in current year 2. from first full week in current year 3. from first week with thursday in current year perhaps more... I suspect it depends on locale which should be used. --------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: