Re: VACUUM on multi-CPU systems?
От | Tycho Fruru |
---|---|
Тема | Re: VACUUM on multi-CPU systems? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1031322000.1117.25.camel@kungfoo.conostix.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: VACUUM on multi-CPU systems? (Jeff Boes <jboes@nexcerpt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, 2002-09-06 at 16:14, Jeff Boes wrote: > On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:04:23 -0400, Jeff Boes wrote: > > > Does anyone have any thoughts on whether my database vacuum/full/analyze > > might go faster on our 2-CPU system if I generated the VACUUM commands > > into a script, e.g., > > > > psql -a <<EOF > > \t > > \o /tmp/db_maint.$$ > > select distinct on (relname) 'VACUUM FULL ANALYZE "' || relname || '";' > > from pg_class > > where relkind='r' > > \g > > \o > > EOF > > > > (generates a script that looks like > > > > VACUUM FULL ANALYZE table1; > > VACUUM FULL ANALYZE table2; > > > > etc.) > > > > and then started two psql sessions each processing half of the file? > > I didn't see any response to this, so I'll try just one more time and > then shut up ... I think that vacuum will be more rapidly disk-bound then CPU-bound. So if you've got different spindles for your tables, go ahead and perform multiple vacuum full's at the same time (even on a uniprocessor machine) The proof of the pudding is of course what you all know (and like !) Tycho -- Tycho Fruru tycho@fruru.com "Prediction is extremely difficult. Especially about the future." - Niels Bohr
Вложения
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: