Re: Proposed GUC Variable

On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 16:14, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > But we should have some default to print some of the query, because
> > > right now we print none of it. I am not saying it is perfect, but it is
> > > better than what we have, and is a reasonable default.
> > On an error, you may not be able to reproduce it.  Why not print the
> > whole query to the log?
> > 
> > I don't see a reason for truncating it at 80 chars. 
> > 
> > IMHO, of course. 
> 
> Because every typo query, every syntax error of a user in psql would
> appear in your logs.  That seems excessive.  Already the ERROR line
> appears in the logs.  Do we want to see their bad query too?
> 
> My concern is that long queries could easily bulk up the logs to the
> point where the actual important log messages would be lost in the fog.
Hmm.  I think the 80 should be a GUC variable (and also settable from
SQL SET as well), and the 80 should probably be higher. 

And, maybe send the full query at a different Syslog(3) level.


-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749