Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 2
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 10299.939691695@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | psql Week 2 (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > 2. What about including an snprintf() into the source tree similar what is > done with strdup()? There is one in the backend/port/ directory, along with some other important library routines that are missing on certain platforms. Up to now we haven't worried about including these into anything but the backend, but I see no reason not to include them into psql if you need 'em. (Probably would not be a good idea to put them into libpq though, since that could cause conflicts with user apps that supply their own versions.) See backend/port/Makefile.in for the tests that determine whether individual routines need to be included. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: