Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions
Дата
Msg-id 10287.1504728236@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm not entirely following.  I thought that add_path was set up to treat
>> "can be parallelized" as an independent dimension of merit, so that
>> parallel paths would always survive.

> Here, the Gather path is not parallel-safe, but rather
> parallel-restricted:

Ah, right, the problem is with the Gather not its sub-paths.

>> Might be a tad messy to rearrange things that way.

> Why do you think I wanted you to do it?  :-)

I'll think about it.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Fix performance of generic atomics
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage